|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
How Do We Stop Mass Murder?
Submitted by:
Robert Morse
Website: http://slowfacts.wordpress.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
‘How do we stop mass murder?’ I keep seeing this question on social media after the murders at the Pittsburg Synagogue.
Most of the people asking this question feel strongly about things they don’t understand. They have not studied the issues of physical defense or contemporary mental health. I’m sorry to give them the bad news, but there is no magic button to fix the human condition.
We can not eliminate mass murder, but we can reduce it. |
Comment by:
Stripeseven
(10/30/2018)
|
I guess that it has been said, that if you feel a touch of Evil it's too late, that's probably true. The demented person that has death and destruction on their minds, will always find a gap in your defenses, providing you even have one. Law Enforcement means well, but they can't be everywhere all of the time. Be ready... Seconds count... |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/30/2018)
|
By everybody refusing to be murdered, by DOING something about it (hint: CARRY A GUN). |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|