
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MI: To have an honest conversation on guns, left must stop lying
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
... "Already, many on the left, including our Democratic president, are trying to use the shooting as a lever to get the majority of Americans, as well as Congress, to support more stringent gun control laws. ..."
"The idea that people like Roof hold such perverted ideas like racism saddens me. That any person drifted so far from reality to kill nine people is hideous and heartbreaking."
"Yet, when addressing the country over such a wretched event, President Obama seemingly couldn’t help himself. He abandoned his role as our national leader, one in which he could have both consoled us and maybe addressed the issue of racism, and decided to flat out lie to America and play partisan politics." ... |
Comment by:
laker1
(6/24/2015)
|
OK, no more gun control. Conversation is over. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|