|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
VA: National Guard is a formal militia
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The Constitution mentions militias in several places (Article 1, Sec. 8; Article 2, Sec 2; Second and Fifth Amendments). I believe we have a formal militia called the National Guard. Most well-known is the Second Amendment which starts “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State…” I do not believe these so-called militias are “well regulated” or “necessary.” |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/14/2020)
|
Links to wrong story.
Correct one here:
https://roanoke.com/opinion/letters/letter-national-guard-is-a-formal-militia/article_79aa4a9c-c9bc-5086-8057-2ecba2c0fd45.html |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|