|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Police Report: Guns Stolen From Georgia Chief's SUV
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Multiple guns were recently reported stolen from a Georgia police chief's city-owned SUV, despite a department policy stating firearms should not be left unattended inside take-home cars, police records obtained by a newspaper show. The firearms were taken from Chamblee police Chief Kerry Thomas' city-issued Chevrolet Tahoe while it was at an apartment complex on March 26, The Atlanta Journal Constitution reported Tuesday, citing Chamblee police reports. |
| Comment by:
jac
(4/8/2020)
|
That's why anyone that believes that "Only the police should have guns" is delusional.
Restrict guns to the police and military, and the only people that will be denied firearms are law abiding citizens.
The criminals will still have guns because they will steal them or smuggle them into the country illegally. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
