|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Send me your questions now for Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
When I first started writing about Patrick “Tate” Adamiak’s plight about 21 months ago, I never thought he would be an honored guest at the Second Amendment Foundation’s Gun Rights Policy Conference, or that I would be able to interview him about his undeserved four years behind bars, but that, friends, is exactly what is going to happen.
As almost all of you know, Tate recently received a “full and unconditional” pardon from President Donald Trump after he was sentenced to more than 20 years in federal prison following his arrest for illegally possessing a toy machine gun and other legal gun parts by Biden-era ATF agents. At the time of his arrest, Adamiak was an active-duty Navy E-6 who had been accepted to BUD/S (SEAL training). |
| Comment by:
jimobxpelham
(9/17/2026)
|
| A GOOD QUESTION SHOULD HAS THE ATF AGENTS INVOLVED IN THIS ILLEGIAL GOVT ACTIONS RESULTING IN HIM BEING INDICTED AND FOUND CONVICTED BEEN INDICTED OR CHARGES WITH THIS PHONY TRIAL, THEY NEED TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS HAVE THEY DONE IT BEFORE?????? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
