|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
Sosalty
(8/18/2016)
|
| Training is great, yet there are considerations of mandating such. Why can't the permit providers give a big discount for your license to carry, when you show proof of a credible training course? |
| Comment by:
mzanghetti
(8/18/2016)
|
| I like the idea of a permit discount if you get training, but I have another question, what business is it of the Catholic Church to actively campaign against a particular piece of legislation? They can preach in their churches and I have no problem with them laying out church teaching but you can expand just war theory to actually support the idea of self defense. I think they were wrong to come out in support of not overriding the Governors veto. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
