|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
AFRet
(10/23/2017)
|
I think it's time the first amendment proponents got a taste of what licensing a constitutional right does to that right.
Now you turkeys will get a taste of what we in the second amendment community have had to put up with. Mostly BECAUSE of you!!!!! |
| Comment by:
dasing
(10/23/2017)
|
| 1A and 2A are, BOTH, absolute rights, if your speech harms someone you are responsible for the actions produced by your speech, if you misuse a firearm you are responsible for the results, if you do neither, how can you be restricted... NOT according to our constitution !!! |
| Comment by:
mickey
(10/23/2017)
|
| The journalists and journalism professors universally agree, you're comparing apples to bowling balls, because, well, it's entirely different when you attack their rights! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
