|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
jac
(6/13/2019)
|
Flaming liberal. He would get rid of the entire constitution if he could. Who cares what he thinks. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(6/13/2019)
|
Stevens: "MIND BOGGLING!!! *ahek, mutter, mumble* yes... yes... mind boggling..." - Could the prog disconnect from founding principles and the soul of America be any more apparent? (rhetorical) |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(6/13/2019)
|
Well, thankfully he is retired. But think of the damage he's done.
Ignorant @ssh@t. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|