|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(3/15/2018)
|
They had one mass shooting that prompted a ban.
So, of course it stands to reason that the ban is responsible for there being no mass shootings since.
Not.
Aside from that, Australia does have a violent crime problem, and people are still being murdered.
This in a country with a population not very different than New York City's.
Not REALLY as impressive as the article would want us to believe ... not at all. |
| Comment by:
netsyscon
(3/15/2018)
|
And we all know that Liberal Statistics are gospel. And according to Libtard poles Hilary won.
What a bunch of losers!!
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers" delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.' A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power." [Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859)] |
|
|
