|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Attitudes toward guns have changed, so must response
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Have you heard of the latest trend in the handgun market? It's the gun shaped to look just like a smartphone. I can hear the pitch: "Folks, you won't have to wait much longer for this deadly cutie."
Such a gun opens up a whole new world of self-defense possibilities. How about glam guns? Can I personalize my smartphone gun with a pink, glittery cover that showcases my fashion sense? Can I add a ring-tone? I don't know about you, but I really want my gun to match my shoes.
The maker of the smartphone gun defends his design, saying it's more inconspicuous and less likely to end up in the wrong hands. Fiction can be fun, but the reality is any gun can end up in the wrong hands eventually. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(4/16/2016)
|
| Yes, guns do end up in the wrong hands, since they keep releasing violent cons instead of making them serve the full sentance. Reinstate 3 strikes you are out for violent offenders. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers" delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.' A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power." [Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859)] |
|
|
