|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Non-Lead Bullets are Better for Hunters and Hunting
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutinnetwork.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Hunting is a pastime steeped in tradition. Conservation, coming-of-age hunts, first beers and butchering parties, to name a few. One tradition that is on its way out, however, is the use of lead core bullets. Growing numbers of hunters are giving up their “daddy’s bullets” for more modern, equally effective and wildlife-friendly non-lead alternatives. |
| Comment by:
shootergdv
(1/7/2019)
|
| Kinda funny to refer to projectiles designed to kill animals as "wildlife friendly" |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(1/7/2019)
|
"Corey Ellis lives in Missoula and is an avid hunter, angler and active member of several hunting, fishing and conservation organizations."
Yeah, but you left something out. Is Corey a DEMOCRAT?
If so then he's a Fudd and nothing he says should be given any credence.
The final score should always read, "Fundamental Right 1, Animals 0".
Only Fudds think otherwise. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|
