|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
dasing
(12/7/2016)
|
| More BS study by tyrants! |
| Comment by:
punch
(12/7/2016)
|
| Oregon has mandatory background checks but that didn't prevent Columbine or Umpqua College. I'm calling BS on this story. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(12/7/2016)
|
"States that required background checks for gun buyers .... "
It's a FEDERAL requirement, idiot. FEDERAL. THAT means EVERY state must use a NICS check.
Thus how can you conclude ANYTHING about the number of school shootings in relation to firearms checks.
|
| Comment by:
Sosalty
(12/7/2016)
|
| San Bernardino Christmas party, Taft High School, and others. B.S. Cali, your state has provided bogus stats and will only get worst in the near future. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/7/2016)
|
Begin with a lie, and the rest of your screed becomes suspect.
All states have background checks pursuant to federal law.
None of those states have background checks for purchasing ammunition, and of states that do, the "odds" claim is pure speculation. To prove that claim, you must show that without them, those states would be more susceptable, which is impossible to prove.
Get off it. Everybody, and I mean EVERYBODY knows that you guys blow liberal smoke, and liberal thinking defies natural law. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
