|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
mickey
(10/23/2017)
|
| First he says "keep the laws that work", and then he gives a list of laws that don't work and says we need to keep them... |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/23/2017)
|
I don't know what article you were reading, Mickey.
Here's what he actually said:
Magazine Capacity Restrictions: "Let’s get rid of this failed law."
Outlaw Semi-Automatic Weapons: "Gun prohibition failed to disarm criminals, so let’s get rid of it."
Prohibit Private Citizens from Owning Firearms: "Prohibition fails, so let’s get rid of it."
We need more gun-free zones: "Since murderers like them, let’s get rid of gun free zones."
And finally: "[I] want to get rid of these gun control laws that don’t work." |
| Comment by:
mickey
(10/23/2017)
|
Phorto, that would be the article I skimmed.
When I saw 'Demand Universal Background Checks' as the first point, I pretty much stopped reading, so I missed him tearing that demand down, not making it. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
