|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
DC: Gun Advocate Emily Miller To Leave Fox 5 Station
Submitted by:
David WIlliamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Emily Miller, the chief investigative reporter for Washington, D.C.'s Fox 5 (WTTG) is leaving the station following the expiration of her two-year contract with the outlet.
Miller became known during her tenure at Fox 5 for using her role a reporter to advance a pro-gun agenda, leading the station to eventually disclose after criticism that she was "a proponent of Second Amendment rights." Controversy also arose surrounding the revelations that she had largely fabricated her story of being a "home invasion" victim, which she said propelled her into pro-gun advocacy. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(3/2/2016)
|
What a transparent hit piece, chock-full of unsubstantiated allegations.
But hey, that's MediaMutters for ya. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
