|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
WA: Crossing the Line – Firearm Preemption Protection Under Attack
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Gun control groups are fond of describing preemption as a doctrine whereby a state has stripped local governments of their power to regulate guns. In fact, under established legal principles, localities are subordinate “creatures of state law,” with no inherent rights or powers other than what a state decides to delegate to them through statutes or charters. Although some local governments may be delegated an authority to regulate public safety and welfare (“police power”) as broad as that exercised by the granting state itself, this power retains its essential character as delegated authority and is limited both by the corporate boundaries of the locality and any restrictions on its exercise that may be imposed by the state. |
| Comment by:
xqqme
(1/20/2018)
|
| How to eliminate guns in one easy step: create an impossible to comply mosaic of contradictory and confusing criminal statutes that, once a person violates any one, makes them into a "prohibited person". On a national level (New Jersey being one example) this kind of selective criminalization of a Constitutionally enumerated Right seems to be working for the gun-control crowd, as even with a full "pardon" the conviction stands. Only SCOTUS or Congress can now fix this issue, but neither seems so inclined. Did the House pass reciprocity as political theater, knowing that the Senate would not? One part of me worries that it is so. |
|
|
