|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
mickey
(10/14/2017)
|
Buying a gun has nothing to do with keeping and bearing arms, because anybody who wants to buy a foundry and a machine shop can simply build a gun for themselves.
Perhaps we can also limit abortions to women who have the resources to become MDs before giving themselves an abortion? I'm sure the 9th Circus Courts wouldn't find that to be overly burdensome. After all, they just established the precedent for it. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/14/2017)
|
This is a zoning issue, much like the attempt by Chicago to stifle the 2A by using zoning to prohibit gun ranges in Cook County. The court ruled that such tactics materially infringe 2a protections.
This is no different. Substitute "dealers" for "gun ranges", and you have exactly the same issue.
That puts the 7th Circuit and the 9th Circuit in conflict.
SCOTUS, anyone....? |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|