|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(12/7/2019)
|
Only works with gun registration.
This is a foot in the door to require all guns be registered. And the gun control faction is well aware that this is only the first step. |
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(12/7/2019)
|
| Alrighty then…So let the deprivation of rights begin. Right?.. Wrong.. The Republics Constitution does not give them the unchecked, unchallenged power that they so desire. No one has been given the green light to try and destroy the Bill of Rights. Do what is right, even when no one is watching...Honor the Oath..Serve..not Rule... |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/8/2019)
|
The response is simple: IGNORE THEM.
No one has a duty to obey unconstitutional laws, and the meme that laws aren't unconstitutional until the Supreme Court says they are is ridiculous.
If the SCOTUS rules a law that's been in force for 20 years is unconstitutional, that means that for TWENTY YEARS people have been subjected to an unconstitutional law.
Non sequitur. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege. [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)] |
|
|
