|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Time to Start Treating Guns Like Abortions
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Because the Supreme Court, in the Heller case, concluded that there is an individual right to own firearms found in the Second Amendment — just like they ruled in Roe v. Wade that there is an individual right to have an abortion found in the Fourth Amendment.
Yet — the Supreme Court notwithstanding — Republicans have spent over 40 years regulating abortion providers and inserting themselves into the lives of women seeking a safe and legal abortion |
| Comment by:
mickey
(9/8/2015)
|
| Yet — the Supreme Court notwithstanding — Republicans and Democrats have spent over 80 years regulating firearms makers and inserting themselves into the lives of women seeking a safe and defended home |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
