
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NC: Constitution’s Ban on Secession Could be Dropped Under House Bill
Submitted by:
Anonymous
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A bill filed Tuesday by a trio of N.C. House Republicans seeks to drop a provision in the state constitution that prohibits secession. Another would repeal the constitutional requirement that voters be able to read. ... A third would change the line that says a North Carolina citizen “owes paramount allegiance to the Constitution and government of the United States” by taking out the word “government.” And a fourth would repeal the section in the state constitution that allows the state to regulate the concealed carrying of weapons. ... Voters would decide on the amendment in the November 2018 election.
|
Comment by:
-none-
(2/22/2017)
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=44&v=o8hL2Ml9WHo Beethoven's Ode of Joy played with pistols
https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=84a_1487771245 Trying Out DeGroat Minigun Backpack Setup
|
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|