|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Chelsea Clinton: Gun Control Is Possible Because Scalia Died
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Chelsea Clinton claimed that since late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is no longer on the bench, it is now possible to enact more gun control, if her mother Hillary is elected to nominate a liberal justice.
During a campaign event, Chelsea Clinton said, It matters to me that my mom also recognizes the role the Supreme Court has when it comes to gun control. With Justice Scalia on the bench, one of the few areas where the court actually had an inconsistent record relates to gun control. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/23/2016)
|
| The NRA couldn't have constructed a better ad warning against a possible President Hillary. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(4/23/2016)
|
Come for my guns, Chelsea, Hillary ... I will give you the parts made out of lead.
Whatever happened to "stare decisis?" "It has been decisded," the principle that once SCOTUS takes a decision, THAT is it, it's done? |
| Comment by:
dasing
(4/23/2016)
|
| Justice Scalia was more consistant than all of the liberal judges put together, in all cases. |
| Comment by:
lostone1413
(4/23/2016)
|
| Make no mistake we have no friend when it comes to the 2nd. My Dad who was in the Bulge always taught me to know your line in the sand. That is what is worth fighting for and need be what is worth dying or killing for |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
