|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Lawmakers have Chance to Protect Oregonians with Gun-Violence Prevention Bill
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Twenty-two years ago my sister-in-law and three nieces, ages six, three and six months, were shot dead at point blank range by her husband, the children’s father, in Scotts Mills. At the time of this shooting, my sister-in-law and her husband were in the midst of a divorce and she had taken out a restraining order against him. Yet, even with that restraining order, her husband was able to acquire a shotgun that morning. If he would have never gotten his hands on a gun, I might be celebrating my nieces’ birthdays today. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(6/27/2017)
|
| Violent criminals do NOT care about laws, duh...! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
