|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
We are facing an unprecedented corporate tyranny in America
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Credit card companies began to deny service to people buying products leftists dislike, especially guns. In places in which leftists ran gun-sellers out of town, that made it impossible for residents to use the internet for their Second Amendment rights.
Glenn Greenwald, who values freedom and foolishly thought leftism was that path to freedom, understands this, which is why he wrote that "The Threat of Authoritarianism in the U.S. Is Very Real, and Has Nothing to Do with Trump." Instead, the real threat comes from "a few corporate monopolies." |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(12/31/2020)
|
| This is true, it is DANGEROUS and everyone on this site needs to inform themself of what's happening, assuming they do not already know. There are going to be very hard times ahead for our liberty if we turn a deaf ear to this. Nothing about this is an accident, it is ALL HAPPENING ACCORDING TO PLAN!!!!!!! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
