|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
SC: Harris Teeter Pulls Gun Publications from Shelves in The Wake of Florida Shooting
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The parent company of Harris Teeter will stop selling "a few assault rifle-themed periodicals" on its newsstands. Kroger spokesperson Kristal Howard told Bloomberg that the Ohio-based supermarket chain will still carry certain gun-related magazines in its 2,800 stores in 35 states at an unspecified time. In Feb. 27, Walmart and Dick's Sporting Goods took notable, and seemingly influential, steps in curtailing the availability of gun-related products. Walmart announced that it would not sell guns to those under 21 and that it would even stop selling toys resembling guns or assault rifles. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(3/21/2018)
|
IOW, the most popular and common kind of long guns have become the "red-headed stepchild" of 'moderates'.
Lock 'em in the attic and pretend they don't exist, whydon'cha? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
