|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
A voice from the pro-gun crowd
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Now how about a voice from the pro-gun group, the pro-hunting faction, the firearms collectors and all gun owners. But let's not forget the bullet reloaders.
Most gun owners are all good shots, and safe gun handlers, for the safety issue, whether self-taught, group taught or grandpa taught, is very important and necessary.
A few own so-called "black rifles," AR types, M-15 types or semi-autos with large capacity box detachable magazines. But some of us, the more fortunate, own War II Grands, whose en-block nondetachable magazines have a capacity of only eight rounds. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/19/2020)
|
I take issue with only one thing the author says. Overall, his is a sane perspective, but my "Fudd" alarm goes off whenever I hear a so-called "pro-gun" person say this:
"A few own so-called 'black rifles,' AR types, M-15 types or semi-autos with large capacity box detachable magazines."
If he really believes this, somebody please educate him. Reality is that more than a few MILLION own them, and there are even more millions in circulation because many own more than one.
By referring to us as a mere "few," his "Fudd" is hanging out like an un-tucked shirt tail. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/19/2020)
|
| test |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
