|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MT: Bullock Must Veto Gun Legislation
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Montana is known for its millions of acres of preserved land, sweeping from the mountains across the badlands, and has earned the nickname “the last best place.” Living in the ultimate destination for sportsmen and sportswomen, most Montanans, including my daughter, whose father is an avid hunter, grew up in a gun-owning household. We value responsibility, community and hard work. As a native Montanan, I’m proud to be a small-business owner – contributing to our thriving community and serving up some of the best cuisine you’ll have around town. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/10/2017)
|
"Angela Loessberg of Stevensville is a volunteer with the Montana chapter of Moms Demand Action."
Therefore, anything she says must be disregarded out-of-hand as worthless, dangerous communist propaganda.
The governor MUST, must he? Just because YOU want him to? Well, the governor MUST NOT veto the bill, just because I DON'T want him to.
THERE! See how that works....? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|
