|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
-none-
(5/15/2015)
|
youtube.com/watch?v=iyhmn-4GPnE
politicalnewspaper.wordpress.com/2015/04/22/muslims-take-over-australian-security-companies/
In the last 3 years there has been a massive “beyond normal” rise in Muslim security companies and security agents, inclusive of gun license permits.
This also includes Gov't contracts for security services, however, if one was to look from an extremists point of view, this puts many weapons in peoples hands, gains control over most club security whereby it can assist drug sales and recruitment of Muslim converts.
This problem was noted by a top level USA security agent who seemed to be hushed up since raising this.
pamelageller.com/2015/05/breast-ripper-isis-savagely-mutilates-women-who-breastfeed-in-public.html/ |
| Comment by:
-none-
(5/15/2015)
|
http://www.tpnn.com/2015/05/15/isis-threatens-more-attacks-on-american-soil-names-states-and-time-frame/
Western Journalism also recently reported that ISIS proclaimed that it has “71 trained soldiers in 15 different states” in the U.S. “ready at our word to attack any target we desire.” The group specifically mentioned five targeted states including Virginia, Maryland, Illinois, California, and Michigan, and promised that “The next six months will be interesting.” |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
