|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Anti-Gun Sculptures: The Next Step In Public Indoctrination
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constiutionnetwork.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The gun control lobby has come up with a new way to convince supporters of the Second Amendment to abandon their pro-gun stance. With the recent spate of high-profile school shootings, the left has reignited its crusade to bring about more anti-gun legislation. So far, the lobby’s tactics seem to have had little impact on overall public opinion. Now, it is trying a uniquely different approach. Gun control activists have designed statues depicting frightened children as a visual tool intended to persuade Americans to reconsider their pro-gun views. Using visuals is an effective persuasion tool, but in this case, it will likely fail. |
| Comment by:
netsyscon
(9/18/2018)
|
| Fantastic, great idea. Remember all the historical statues the left has destroyed, and the cost of them. Well Libtards, go ahead and spend your money. The deplorables will be there. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
