|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
netsyscon
(3/5/2018)
|
Poor Tim, we Deplorables should start calling the radio stations and tell them that we would be boycotting them and their sponsors if they play Tim's songs. Also, I can see protests outside of his concerts. Oh well. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(3/5/2018)
|
The lefties think that because a twanger metrosexuals out, it lends credence to their preposterous progressive philosophy.
If it didn't become obvious with the ascension of Mylee Cyrus that "show biz" can easily cancel out traditional values even in 'countrified' folk (wadda PIG), McGraw's wussification makes it so. BTW, Billy Cyrus ain't no paragon of conservatism, either, and apparently the apple hasn't fallen far from the tree. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|