|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NH: A question for gun advocates
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The privilege of driving a car comes with a set of responsibilities for ensuring that the car is not used recklessly as a weapon against society. So too should gun ownership. If you keep a gun in your home for self-defense, then it is your responsibility to make sure that you only use it when you have exhausted all other means of keeping your home safe from intruders. |
Comment by:
lbauer
(8/25/2018)
|
The writer by her own admission is not responsible enough to own a firearm and use it for self defense. But she apparently feels she has the right to dictate to others how they should act. She might be well advised to mind her own damn business. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/25/2018)
|
HOW MANY GUDDAM TIMES MUST WE POINT OUT THAT DRIVING IS A PRIVILEGE AND BEARING ARMS IS A RIGHT? |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(8/26/2018)
|
We have a "set of responsibilities" for owning a gun. It is called THE LAW. Learn it, understand it. exhausting all other means of keeping your home safe is not part of the criteria. Fear of imminent death or grave bodily harm is. This threat is often so immediate that a challenging game of 3D chess with the assailant is not an option. You defend yourself or die. Police are great people. But an assailant's knife or bullet will reach you before their radio car will pull in your driveway. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|