
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
mickey
(10/14/2017)
|
Buying a gun has nothing to do with keeping and bearing arms, because anybody who wants to buy a foundry and a machine shop can simply build a gun for themselves.
Perhaps we can also limit abortions to women who have the resources to become MDs before giving themselves an abortion? I'm sure the 9th Circus Courts wouldn't find that to be overly burdensome. After all, they just established the precedent for it. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/14/2017)
|
This is a zoning issue, much like the attempt by Chicago to stifle the 2A by using zoning to prohibit gun ranges in Cook County. The court ruled that such tactics materially infringe 2a protections.
This is no different. Substitute "dealers" for "gun ranges", and you have exactly the same issue.
That puts the 7th Circuit and the 9th Circuit in conflict.
SCOTUS, anyone....? |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|