|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
It’s Time to Repeal—and Replace—the Second Amendment
Submitted by:
Goosie James
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Somewhere in West Virginia, or at a cocktail party of the New York Times editorial board, a conservative Democrat or “NeverTrump” Republican is looking at this article’s headline and thinking, “Oh no! Don’t say that. That’s exactly what the Trump people want you to say!” It has become an axiomatic feature of political gravity that we cannot have a frontal and honest conversation about the Second Amendment because it will whip ammo-sexuals into a frenzy and cause them to vote Republican.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/8/2019)
|
The Nation? Really? Katrina vanden Heuvel's communist rag?
Please.
Memo to vanden Heuvel (et al): "The right there specified is that of 'bearing arms for a lawful purpose'. This is not a right granted by the Constitution. Neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence." - U.S .v Cruikshank (1875) |
| Comment by:
xqqme
(8/9/2019)
|
Badly mangled, indeed... by the anti gunners. Read the State Constitution provisions that existed at the time the US Constitution was ratified: the intent of the 2nd Amendment is clearly an individual Right!
DE - "A person has the right to keep and bear arms for the defense of self, family, home and State, and for hunting and recreational use."
ME - "Every citizen has a right to keep and bear arms and this right shall never be questioned."
NH - "All persons have the right to keep and bear arms in defense of themselves, their families, their property and..."
PA - "The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves ... shall not be questioned."
RI - "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
