|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
The case against the NRA must be politically bulletproof
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
But has she pursued liberal charities with the same vigor with which she is going after the conservative NRA? Has she sought to totally shut down these organizations rather than reform them? Again perhaps she has, but if so, she should cite precedents. In today’s highly politicized atmosphere, the burden is on her to demonstrate equal application of the law to all similarly situated charities, regardless of their political positions. She may be able to satisfy that burden, but she should do it with specific examples, especially of liberal organizations she has tried to shut down and throw out of the state. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(8/8/2020)
|
Who gives a ******* if she's gone after other groups; this attempt to DESTROY the N. R. A. is blatant politics no matter. In timing, so as to make the NRA use its money to pay for the lawsuit rather than to help candidates, or to bring it down. If Wayne la Pew has commited crimes, GO AFTER HIM AS AN INDIVIDUAL in criminal court. And the other top brass.
But taking out the whole organisation is heinious. |
| Comment by:
jac
(8/8/2020)
|
Blatant politics.
They are forcing the NRA to spend money on legal fees that they might have otherwise used to support pro gun politicians in the election.
There should be consequences for this type of behavior, but unfortunately the liberal eletes will get away with it. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
