|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/27/2017)
|
Again with the "Trayvon was murdered." lie.
JUST. STOP. IT. |
| Comment by:
shootergdv
(10/27/2017)
|
| The NRA didn't even start this type of liability insurance, some bean counter decided they would copy USCCA to cash in on the market. The NRA has provided "affiliated" status to insurance carriers before, but getting into their supporters businesses is a new low. What next, NRA ammo, NRA manufactured AR's ? But for the media to act like this is something new when many gun haters have called for REQUIRED insurance on guns/gunowners is laughable. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
