|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/13/2017)
|
On this issue, no matter where it comes up, everyone misses the fundamental question which has NOTHING to do with does it make us "safer" or not.
The question is, "Does this prohibition unconstitutionally infringe the right to bear arms for self-defense?"
The "safety" meme is pure misdirection. There is no evidence that such prohibitions provide more "safety"; in fact, there is no evidence that the lack of them provides LESS "safety".
It's a right. It is fundamental. It can't be proscribed.
Period. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. — Robert Heinlein |
|
|
