|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
FL: Bill Targets Kids Who Post Photos With an Illegal Firearm on Social Media
Submitted by:
David Williamson
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
As a prosecutor, Sen. Jason Pizzo watched helplessly as 20 mothers of murdered children would meet every Tuesday at Miami-Dade County’s Northside police station to discuss their kids’ cases and provide each other support. “If you asked by show of hands, how many arrests or closures have been made and clearance rate for those murders, maybe one or two hands go up,’’ he said, and many of them knew or suspected their child’s killers but prosecutors didn’t have the evidence to prove it.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(2/5/2020)
|
"data shows that black children and teens in Florida are three times more likely to be threatened by a firearm than children of whites and other races"
They are threatened by other blacks in their predominantly black environment. But admitting that truth just isn't convenient, is it?
If enacted into law, this bill will face a 1st Amendment challenge it will probably lose. If the posting contains articulable threats, that creates reasonable suspicion and perhaps even probable cause (depending), but without that critical element merely posting such a picture is protected speech.
In the desperation to achieve the stated goal they toss due process restrictions out the window. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence. Thus when my eldest son asked me what he should have done had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908 [by an Indian extremist opposed to Gandhi's agreement with Smuts], whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defend me, I told him it was his duty to defend me even by using violence. Hence it was that I took part in the Boer War, the so-called Zulu Rebellion and [World War I]. Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. — Mohandas K. Gandhi, Young India, August 11, 1920 from Fischer, Louis ed.,The Essential Gandhi, 1962 |
|
|
