|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
No, the Gun Culture Won’t Always Win
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Too many guns. Too little hope. After each succeeding gun massacre, a dull fatalism grips the American mind. The victims of such massacres are counted in the thousands; the victims of individual murder, of suicide, and of heartrending accident by now are counted in the tens of thousands. Yet action to save lives is vetoed again and again by an implacable minority who see gun ownership as integral to their identity. |
| Comment by:
PP9
(6/3/2019)
|
| There are not too many guns. There are too many criminals. They're a by-product of the poverty factory known as the welfare state. This factory is a favorite of writers of The Atlantic, as it turns out the one thing they need to win elections-- a constant stream of disadvantaged, helpless, dispirited members of the underclass that can be easily led to believe they need Democrats to save them. It's also why they favor limitless importation of members of the underclass in addition to their domestic manufacturing efforts. The last thing they would do is to do anything that would risk breaking the cycle of poverty and learned helplessness, for that would allow the underclass to rise from poverty and have no more use for a purported rescuer. |
| Comment by:
PP9
(6/3/2019)
|
| The "implacable minority" included the founders of this country, who enshrined such rights in the Constitution of the United States, which trumps any culture (at least in theory... all it takes is judges who can read). |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
