|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Can Guns Be Safe Around Kids?
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
So how did this tragic event happen then? There are several factors in handgun safety, especially if children may come into contact with the weapon.
Since the make and model of handgun has not been officially released, there is some speculation as to the actual cause due to differences in firearms.
Preventing unintentional discharge outside of the home can be minimized by following some simple steps. |
| Comment by:
kangpc
(1/2/2015)
|
This is the most poorly written and poorly edited news article I have seen in a long time.
The headline is laughable and the first paragraph continues the joke. After that it just gets worse.
Apparently the Falun Gong people are more interested in their problems with China than in publishing competent journalism in English. |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(1/3/2015)
|
A more cogent opening premise would be, "can kids be safe around guns ? ", which removes the false "deux ex machina" aspect of the argument. And all of the "gun culture" knows age-appropiate gun training is the only "safe " way. Sadly, it seems, the lady was using an "off body carry" device she received as a Christmas present.
OTOH, this is a salutary lesson for every parent. Never underestimate the knowledge/strength/ability of our toddlers when presented with challenges. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
