|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(2/29/2016)
|
Opponents are misrepresenting the issue, which is arbitrary denial of services and backdoor registration.
First, denial of services for refusing to answer non-medical-related questions that invade privacy is viewpoint discrimination, which is unconstitutional. Next is the inclusion of gun data in the patient's medical files, which is completely inappropriate and becomes a de facto registration of the patient owning guns.
The intrusion into private information peripheral to a patient's medical treatment primarily to satisfy the physician's philosophical opposition to gun ownership is improper. Anti-gun doctors rationalize it as necessary to providing treatment, but that is a falsehood.
They ought to know that WE know what they are up to. |
| Comment by:
AFRet
(2/29/2016)
|
| Just answer NO. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. — Noah Webster in "An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution," 1787, in Paul Ford, ed., Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, at p. 56 (New York, 1888). |
|
|
