
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
TX: Strict Interpretation
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
When someone cites “The Second Amendment” we are supposed to bow our heads in some sort of divine reverence. When someone says we don’t want to infringe on the rights of “law-abiding citizens” we are supposed to recognize their undefined minority rights over our right to not be killed by guns in school, at the theater or just going about our daily lives. The Second Amendment is specific about the rights it is talking about. It isn’t hunting.
We should pass a federal law which prohibits anyone to own a gun unless they can demonstrate a need based upon self-defense. |
Comment by:
lucky5eddie
(10/10/2019)
|
Links to the wrong story. A good story, but not the one advertised. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/10/2019)
|
Wrong link. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/10/2019)
|
Based upon the synopsis, I say, get a life. We have the right, the Framers identified and codified it, it isn't granted by government and government cannot remove it, so....
...GET LOST. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|