|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
OH: Ohio clerk pulls out own gun and shoots armed robber dead
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A robbery suspect in Dayton, Ohio was shot and killed Wednesday night by a Dollar General Store clerk.
Police say the suspect entered the store around 6:20 p.m., pointed a gun at the worker and demanded money.
Officers say the clerk then pulled out a gun and shot the suspect in self-defense.
The suspect tried to run out of the store, but he collapsed outside the front doors. He was pronounced dead at the scene.
No one else was injured. |
| Comment by:
jac
(10/11/2019)
|
That will put a dent in the local crime statistics. Consider how many future crimes were prevented by removing this worthless excuse for a human from society.
This is the only thing that keeps criminals in check. They don't have any fear of police or the criminal justice system. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/11/2019)
|
| Now, THAT's what'cha call 'social justice'! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
