|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
OK: Oklahoma senator defends anti-red flag law bill
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Broken Arrow State Sen. Nathan Dahm has filed a bill that would prevent lawmakers from creating a red flag law in an attempt to preempt a federal version of the law.
Seventeen states have red flag laws, which allow law enforcement or family members to petition a court to temporarily take away someone's firearms if that person is considered a danger to themselves or others.
Dahm's bill would prohibit the state from passing a red flag law or enforcing federal law. |
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(1/4/2020)
|
The Constitutional duty of elected servants is to stay within the rules described in the Republics Constitution. Nothing more. Serve not Rule..
Due process of law should not be skirted around in order to achieve the unconstitutionally desired results.
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
