|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/3/2018)
|
"For example, Graham promised to sign an executive order — despite the threat of a lawsuit from the National Rifle Association — to ban assault weapons like the one used in the attack at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in February."
No one with such a cavalier attitude regarding the use of undelegated powers should ever hold office of any kind. This is not only a problem with Graham - it is a problem with the majority of Democrats. They believe that there is no constitutional line the government cannot cross if it deems it "for the public good". It's that "living constitution" nonsense, and it is counterfeit.
No one should ever, EVER vote for a Democrat.
Ever. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
