|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/14/2019)
|
| Test. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/14/2019)
|
"Some gun-rights activists would murder government officials who try to enforce a duly passed law."
No, they would attack a government and its officials who try to enforce a 'duly passed' UNCONTITUTIONAL law that promiscuously discards the Constitution's command that it may not do so.
That ain't 'murder'.
That would be The People exercising their DoI right to alter or abolish a government that deliberately defied its duty to secure their individual rights, and attempted to nullify those rights by force. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
