|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(1/22/2020)
|
"Removing to duty to retreat from our current self defense laws would create a wild west, I’ve even been told that by some people."
Really? REALLY? You've been TOLD that by some people?
First, you need to consider the politics and ideology of the people telling you that. Then, fact check to ascertain whether or not they're telling you the truth.
There is NO evidence of any "wild west" environs resulting from SYG laws. It is a hot-button term used to stoke people's fears and emotions.
In fact, any increase in homicides in states with SYG are mostly JUSTIFIED shootings.
But to anti-gun folks, there IS no justification for shooting someone, which is ironclad proof that they live in a fantasy bubble. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. — Noah Webster in "An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution," 1787, in Paul Ford, ed., Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, at p. 56 (New York, 1888). |
|
|
