|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
FL: Second Amendment must change with the times
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
It's way past time to modernize the Second Amendment. Yes people kill people; guns don't kill people. But guns don’t go off by themselves.
Guns in the hands of people are dangerous, even in the hands of people who are trained in their use. I'm certainly not advocating disarming the police. However, the recent killing of a Dallas, Texas individual in his own apartment by a policewoman is just the most recent demonstration how things can go wrong concerning guns.
Ed.: Third story on page. |
| Comment by:
jac
(9/20/2018)
|
This guy believes that the government can guarantee your safety, therefore, we don't need the second amendment.
He must live in a bubble. People are assaulted, raped and murdered every day.
The only people that believe that we don't need the second amendment are liberals, kooks, and the much fewer then a million morons.
I for one would keep the second amendment as it was originally intended, not as the liberals have already eviscerated it.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/20/2018)
|
| Kool Aid drinker. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
