|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
TX: Why Texans worry about open carry
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A few months ago, an angry patient walked into the clinic where I work as a family physician. He threatened staff in the waiting room. His physician was pulled from her exam room and advised to stay behind a locked door. Security called 911. It took local police about 25 minutes to arrive. I am grateful he did not have a gun and would have felt no safer if another patient or clinic staff member had been carrying a firearm. |
| Comment by:
jac
(1/1/2016)
|
Link is for another article.
From the synopsis of the article, it would appear to have been written by someone with mush for brains.
It took 25 minutes for the police to arrive and she would have felt no safer if a staffer had a gun. Are people really this stupid? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
