|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Florida pro-gun push ill-timed, ill-advised after Pulse
Submitted by:
David Willliamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Almost six months ago, the worst mass shooting in modern U.S. history at Orlando's Pulse nightclub renewed interest across the country in reasonable limits on guns. But that's not what we're seeing in the opening volley of bills for the next regular session of the Florida Legislature that begins in March. Some gun-loving legislators still believe the Sunshine State needs fewer restrictions, not more, on where people can carry firearms.
|
| Comment by:
dasing
(12/6/2016)
|
| It is against the constitution to have any firearm control laws!! |
| Comment by:
Sosalty
(12/6/2016)
|
| Why would restoring an eroded bill of right, the 2A, immediately, be bad timing? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
