|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Please Regulate Guns Like Cars!
Submitted by:
Robert Morse
Website: http://slowfacts.wordpress.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
There is a popular idea that we should regulate firearms the way we regulate automobiles. Really? Let’s see where that road leads. I wrote this for fun, but I was amazed at the ways we infringe on the right to bear arms.
-We can finally buy and sell our cars firearms across state lines.
-Each state and city now recognizes your drivers license license to carry concealed.
-You can rent a gun for the afternoon if your gun is in the shop.
-The city provides gun-storage locations free of charge in front of no-gun zones in order to attract customers to downtown. About time.
-A gun dealership can lease you a firearm on a five year payment plan.
(Continued)
Tell me what you think if we regulated firearms the way we regulate cars. |
| Comment by:
laker1
(10/17/2015)
|
Felons can drive them
16 year olds can drive them
you can own them at any age
at 60mph they have hundreds of thousands of ft-lbs of kinetic energy, where even big guns have 2-4 thousand ft-lbs.
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
