|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
LA: Governor’s veto of concealed carry increases likelihood of historic veto session
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The veto of the concealed carry bill on the heels of a veto to ban transgender females from competing in women’s sports has increased the likelihood of the first-ever veto session to be called.
Morris said he’s optimistic a session will be called and conceal carry will become law in Louisiana.
“We may make a little bit of history here, but we’ll have to see, I don’t know yet but I’m hopeful because I think a lot of the legislation that did get vetoed are things that the citizens of Louisiana really want,” said Morris.
The measure received wide support during the session it passed in the Senate on a 27-9 vote and in the House 73-28. |
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(6/26/2021)
|
I don't know how Louisiana NEVER had a veto override session before, EVER in its history, but ok. Did it just become a state? (kidding).
No news stories ever point out that this passed by veto proof 2/3 margins in both chambers. By 3 votes in the senate and by 6 votes in the house. "Journalists" nowadays are scared of math obviously. No wonder they all buy the big lie that Xiden somehow won the presidency.
Anyway, this doofus governor waits till literally the last minute to veto it? Why? Assessing the political damage to his lame duck self? So the sponsor tried reasoning with this democrud idiot (waste of time) and didn't ask him what OTHER parts of the bill of rights should require a license. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
