|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
OR: Gunman identified in shooting at Oregon college that left 10 dead
Submitted by:
n/a
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The gunman who killed nine people and injured seven at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Ore. Thursday before being killed by police has been identified as Chris Harper Mercer, two law enforcement sources confirmed to Fox News.
Submitter's note: An Oregon community college is the site of another target-rich environment for the lunatics among us. |
| Comment by:
jac
(10/2/2015)
|
It didn’t take long for the usual suspects to blame guns for this incident.
It’s about time that the liberals realize that the only effective response to a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.
I blame this shooting on the liberal politicians, media and Bloomberg types for establishing gun prohibitions that prevent people from being able to defend themselves and reduce the carnage. When will they realize that gun prohibition zones do not work?
{Con't) |
| Comment by:
jac
(10/2/2015)
|
The evidence is clear and overwhelming that gun free zones do not prevent shootings. All that they do is encourage and enable the sickos and malcontents to engage in mass shootings without fear of immediate and effective defense.
Evil exists in this world, and it isn't going to go away.
Get rid of the victim disarmament zones and the mass shootings will decline.
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
